legality
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
legality [2024/10/26 18:44] – daiquiri | legality [2024/10/26 18:57] (current) – daiquiri | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Cannabinoid Legality====== | ====== Cannabinoid Legality====== | ||
- | Since THCa is the most important, we will start with that. Beyond abbreviations, | + | Since THCa is the most important, we will start with that. Beyond abbreviations, |
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
- | * **Colorado** - In Colorado, only Type II flower is legal for partaking. This is because Colorado does not allow weed that has CBD in a higher number of 15:1 ratio to THC (Higher means less). Therefore, any flower with THCa >13% must have CBD >1%, and the percent must increase by 1 with every percent of THCa (about). | + | * **Colorado** - In Colorado, only [[type_2_cannabis|Type II]] flower is legal for partaking. This is because Colorado does not allow weed that has CBD in a higher number of 15:1 ratio to THC (Higher means less). Therefore, any flower with THCa >13% must have CBD >1%, and the percent must increase by 1 with every percent of THCa (about). |
* **Iowa** - Their legislature is worded to heavily imply that THCa itself is illegal, but still falls into the <0.3% Delta-9. Their wording says " | * **Iowa** - Their legislature is worded to heavily imply that THCa itself is illegal, but still falls into the <0.3% Delta-9. Their wording says " | ||
* **Ohio** - Weed is legal here, but lawful hemp cannot contain 0.3% THC of any type. The grey area comes from the method of testing, which is not worded specifically enough to be sure of. | * **Ohio** - Weed is legal here, but lawful hemp cannot contain 0.3% THC of any type. The grey area comes from the method of testing, which is not worded specifically enough to be sure of. |
legality.1729968295.txt.gz · Last modified: by daiquiri